Closed CrowdfordBot closed 1 year ago
shapechange: make bb permanently disguised as butcher
shapechange: <@242983689921888256> <@277156693765390337> <@544125116640919557> <@203091600283271169> any thoughts?
e_thsn: Would be interesting
e_thsn: Strong I assume
e_thsn: Like SnW
shapechange: strong or weak, don't particularly mind
shapechange: but I do think it really needs one
federick: I dont like disguises much but if its a necessary evil then sure
e_thsn: Without disguises town is too reliant on TI
mctsts: Not a fan
mctsts: Butchers are more fun in combination with Tanner
shapechange: i like them in combo with tanner but i feel they really don't work with pack tanner
mctsts: Pack Tanner still works but forces the wolves to be smart about it
mctsts: I think for some games a disguised butcher might work better, but overall I think adding the disguise takes a lot away from the game
shapechange: the thing with PT is it works but it kind of locks PT into one course of action, which i despise
mctsts: Well PT can only disguise BB every other night
mctsts: I guess they could still spend every night disguising a butcher
shapechange: yeah - especially with CS that is the absolutely necessary course of action, whilst with FT it's usually best
shapechange: moreover, with tanner and a TI, it's highly likely that either town trust can form N1, or that bb will be dead by D2
shapechange: because it's known to all players that butchers don't claim until N1
mctsts: the icon implies a strong disguise
mctsts: its the same as SnW
shapechange: so the chances of tanner finding and disguising bb correctly D0 are so astronomically slim that an FT is able to trust the result they get N1
mctsts: yea true
mctsts: and even than the only thing that gets taken away is a very generic play that doesn't really do anything interesting
shapechange: i think of adding this disguise as less of a buff to bb and more of a nerf to butchers
mctsts: whereas the disguised BB can lead to much more different ways it can play out
shapechange: yes
mctsts: im convinced
shapechange: yay ^-^
federick:
and even than the only thing that gets taken away is a very generic play that doesn't really do anything interesting
Yea this is true
federick: But I hate how many roles can weakly disguise themselves on D0 ngl
shapechange: <@&1045732542399131769>
if you vote <:yes:590859662161739806>, please also vote for one (or both, if you're indifferent) of the following: 1️⃣ - strong disguise 2️⃣ - weak disguise
bb doesn't need a disguise
something else?
shapechange:
But I hate how many roles can weakly disguise themselves on D0 ngl
yeah, all four of them (hell team and psycho)
federick: Was WWW removed
e_thsn: strong disguise also guards from AT and Ranger
shapechange: www disguise is inbuilt
federick: <:thonk:681990540266569875>
e_thsn:
Was WWW removed
WWW and SnW don't get the choice
shapechange: it doesn't choose its disguise
federick: Oh right
shapechange: plus it's strong iirc?
federick: Isnt fox in there too
mctsts: strong disguise to be consistent with SnW
e_thsn:
The White Werewolf imitates the most common non-WG role in the wolfpack. It is strongly disguised as that role and gains all its abilities.
shapechange: no foxes have disguises except df
shapechange: which is temporary and strong iirc
e_thsn: if it's sneaking it's not strongly disguised as snw tho
mctsts: yea
mctsts: <@458727748504911884> you can vote
WWR Sync: <@578133411110060033>