WerewolvesRevamped / Werewolves-Roles

The role book for Werewolves Revamped
7 stars 8 forks source link

Rabid Wolves (solo) #1154

Closed CrowdfordBot closed 11 months ago

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: This solo team would almost be like an alternate wolf pack, similar roles (slight differences) but would be going against the other wolves.

Their goal to win could be to eliminate all other wolves before dealing with town, or could just be the same win con as wolves. I’m not quite sure yet.

But I feel like this solo would be a lot of fun due to the somewhat equal powers of the wolves and this solo, as well, it would be equally beneficial for them to attack wolves as it would be town. Meaning, it is not sided in one way or another.

My thoughts with how they would work would be.

Anyways, discussion to make it better is welcomed, but I’ll say again, I think it would be a really fun solo that doesn’t need to be new mechanics with complex rules, just a counter wolf like solo team.

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: https://github.com/McTsts/Werewolves-Roles/issues/1154

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: So would it work to have a www team? Having many moles in the pack might be a bit hard on wolves.

That said, if the www team had “packless”. Maybe that could work?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: Put that in a role list with other packless. Www “packless” have a connection with the www perhaps?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: Idk, just spitballing.

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: If this idea however would ultimately be no good, I don’t mind putting it to sleep though, don’t want to work on things that don’t have potential.

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: www has remained a single role for a while now

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: but honestly i do think it could use something to help it out, it's hard to win as

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: fr. 1 role that has to be the last one standing.... thats a tall order

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: has been done, but could use a friend somehow

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: how do you feel about a packless www team member? could be in a channel with the www to coordinate. perhaps with an investigate power of sorts

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

e_thsn:

but honestly i do think it could use something to help it out, it's hard to win as

White Warlock?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: that doesn't seem super helpful

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: if www gets roles and the pack doesnt, they can do what they want with the info, no?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: yeah, but that doesn't really give www much of an advantage itself

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: would it be too strong (or boring lol) to have the partner role allow for the www to do an extra kill? but if the extra role dies then the www goes back to normal?

like the extra role is a support character?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: who knows the www so they can communicate other stuff

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: very boring for the extra role, and probably both underpowered and overpowered for the www

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: i think www has the correct amount of kill opportunities rn

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: might be boring for the extra role, but so is cit, so knowing you buff the www could make it okay?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: or even a role that if they die the www gets a bonus kill. but while alive the extra role gets some sort of power?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: just brainstorming here.... ignroe the bad

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange: there's a difference between being a cit (no abilities, but still has a lot of opportunities to make reads and discuss good strategy publicly, as well as claim collecting and potentially getting trusted) and being a powerless scum

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55:

there's a difference between being a cit (no abilities, but still has a lot of opportunities to make reads and discuss good strategy publicly, as well as claim collecting and potentially getting trusted) and being a powerless scum

yeah fair

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: okay, another (dumb) idea.

new role stays at peoples houses, but while at the house, they leave little treats for the www to find. aka, other role visits and gets the www to kill that player.

bonus role is like hooker in that, they cant be killed at night, and while at the other persons house they either A- inspect them B- lure the www to kill them C- do something else ?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: heck, could even be that, when staying at a house, any investigation comes up as a cit read.

so it is somewhat role blocking, but also could confuse town or wolves in an advantageous way to the www.

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: aka, stay at a FTs house, whatever that FT checks, will come up as a cit.

dunno.

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: Very much dislike the original idea, not completely opposed to extending WWW but I'm not really sure what would make sense there

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: Yeah, could be workshopped, but www as is is also fine imo. But if we want to workshop a helper, I would be down to come up with some ideas.

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

mctsts: <@&1045732542399131769> is anyone interested in continuing this?

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captain.luffy: its a second wolf team right

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

captain.luffy: but not aligned with wolves

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

shapechange:

<@&1045732542399131769> is anyone interested in continuing this?

nope

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

e_thsn: I'm not, I'd rather improve www

CrowdfordBot commented 1 year ago

huckhuck55: yeah, delete. im fine with that