Closed CrowdfordBot closed 11 months ago
captainluffy: I think that's how we usually do it for promotion roles
captainluffy: Like I think it holds true for everything
shapechange: yeah it definitely has precedent, but i just wonder if it should be this way for FA specifically
mctsts: I feel like either option we dont want for FA
mctsts: Giving town 2 backups for one TI just always seems bad I think?
mctsts: It's weird if their FT dies and they get 2 new FTs
mctsts: but it's also weird if their FT dies, and they get a new one and then the new one dies and they get yet another one
shapechange:
It's weird if their FT dies and they get 2 new FTs
i think this is definitely worse than the other option
mctsts: It probably is
shapechange:
but it's also weird if their FT dies, and they get a new one and then the new one dies and they get yet another one
this is obviously objectionable, but i can only image having 2 FA in a large game with several TI, so it would be more likely for them to imitate different TI
mctsts: I guess it could work
mctsts: It can probably be added
mctsts: I do kinda dislike making role descs longer for unlikely edge cases
shapechange: it'd only be a line
shapechange:
If there are several Fortune Apprentices when the role would be assumed, a random Fortune Apprentice is selected to assume the role.. The rest remain Fortune Apprentices.
mctsts: That's three lines
mctsts: But it's fine
mctsts:
We can take out This will not happen if the Fortune Apprentice’s role has changed.
shapechange: yes
shapechange: i thought id taken that out myself lol but i mustve forgotten
captainluffy: is it already taken out or still needs ot be done?
mctsts: both the addition and the removal have not be done i think
venomousbirds: seems unanimous, just needs PR
captainluffy: <@&1045732542399131769> Fortune Apprentice update
captainluffy: imo 2 is better but adds a lot of text for something that very unlikely to happen anyways
shapechange: "a lot of text" two entire sentences
captainluffy: https://github.com/McTsts/Werewolves-Roles/pull/1270
shapechange: The Fortune Apprentice description doesn't technically specify what happens if there are multiple FAs, but it's pretty obviously phrased so that if there were multiple, they would all assume the role of the first dead/changed TI at the same time. This seems intentional, but is it something that we want? It would seem more balanced to have only one (selected arbitrarily) assume the role, until the next TI death/rolechange.