Closed CrowdfordBot closed 11 months ago
captainluffy: Is it currently not possible?
e_thsn: err
e_thsn: there's a definition somewhere
mctsts: two WWWs will just be allies
e_thsn:
Is it currently not possible?
White Wolves' is less of a team and more of a group of roles. White Wolves always start out with just themselves on their team, however they pretend to be a werewolf. They win when everyone but them is dead. In rare circumstances (e.g. through copying) the white wolves may contain more than one player.
In rare circumstances (e.g. through copying) the white wolves may contain more than one player.
mctsts: ah
mctsts: I mean that definition could be taken out
mctsts: But probably better to not do that
e_thsn: Just add (e.g. through copying or in larger games)
captainluffy: Or just remove the brackets
captainluffy: With the eg
mctsts: I think I'd like to keep it
mctsts: Cause I don't think 2 WWWs is particularly great
captainluffy: Eg doesn't mean that's the only example, it just means it's one possible example
mctsts: if you absolutely want to do it, do it via rule change
mctsts: but dont make this a possibility for partial lists
e_thsn: I think the last time was the recent 30+ player game
e_thsn: idk why we didn't rule change to make 2 possible
shapechange: im with ts here
mctsts: lets close this?
e_thsn: One ask I saw on the last role survey was that we should have multiple www in games and people wanted to see some www improvement
We were going to do it one game but it said it was rare
make it so it isn't a rare thing and Hosts can add multiple www to a list and they win together (probably through a tie because they can't kill each other hypothetically) but don't know each other's identities