Open CrowdfordBot opened 3 months ago
alphaviki: I think this scenario can only happen between solos and in my non-gm opinion I'd say yes, since it would be a bit unfair to give any solo preferential treatment. You could make a ranking based on how many measures they have to prevent this, but I believe this just makes the game unreasonably more complicated.
alphaviki: On the other hand what I just thought about: How do you prevent solos working together then? Maybe we do need the ranking...
mctsts:
On the other hand what I just thought about: How do you prevent solos working together then? Maybe we do need the ranking...
That's an interesting point
mctsts: But really even from a lore perspective devil and flute don't have a problem with each other
mctsts: And I think this only works for devil and flute
mctsts: All i was planning with this issue is to add a single sentence somewhere in the results section of the rules, but it does raise the question of if we want a FP/Devil alliance to be legal
e_thsn: <@242983689921888256> didn't we already discuss this?
https://discord.com/channels/584765921332297775/584859186287083528/1182300266511487116
mctsts: We did! And we did in fact also already discuss that we discussed it!
mctsts: However no action has been taken so far
mctsts:
On the other hand what I just thought about: How do you prevent solos working together then? Maybe we do need the ranking...
However I dont think this has been considered
e_thsn: I mean what ways can a two team victory occur Last Non-Soulless & Unenchanted player dies Not Pyro, Plague, Horsemen and WWW (need all other teams dead) Not Underworld (need everyone else converted or dead)
The scenario is really specific because it needs
Most likely option is 4 players left, Devil and Demon are enchanted, Flute Player sells soul to kill the last player
mctsts: yep
mctsts: Like I said originally I would've just put one basic sentence in a results section somewhere to resolve the issue without further thought, but we should consider that this allows a FP/Devil alliance
shapechange: hmmm
shapechange: I don't really want to permit an alliance
shapechange: options: a) keep playing until "there is a clear winner" (i.e until one of the teams is eradicated) b) forbid collusions of this style c) just let it slide?
mctsts: is c) "we just pretend we never discussed this and we will probably not have to worry about this until like 2029 because it wont happen anyway?"
shapechange: yea
shapechange: ill be dead by 2029 anyway
mctsts: 👍
e_thsn:
ill be dead by 2029 anyway
huh?
mctsts: Is a two team victory possible?