Closed McTsts closed 2 years ago
meh. bland. just give wisp a disguise or something.
I think a better buffed pyromancer would be something that involves powdering in some way, e.g. immune against attacks of powdered people, so I think we should still remove this and add another buffed pyro instead.
idk man i dont read issues they're not as cool as PRs just link them if theyre duplicate 😔
can't think of anything rn
What about a role that makes powdered players appear as pyro 50% of the time
Doesn't need to be exactly that but something like that
i think the similarity to the fp obstruction just makes that bland
a better pyro tertiary should have a different gimmick, rather than just the application of an obstruction
Ts: Anyone have any ideas?
Ethan.: What about a member of the pyro channel that can powder or ignite one player immediate night, but if they fail to kill them the powder is burnt away and must be reaplied
Captain Luffy: I think wisp does a good job at being a non pyro channel member, so i would think it should be a role that's a member of the pyro channel. It should be able to do powdering of course, so I think it should be a pyromancer with 1 additional ability. So pyromancer would kind of be the equivalent of a vanilla wolf of the wolf pack. Ideas I've thought of are
Ts: I think an ability like 5 might be best (linked to powder)
Ts: Or a passive like 4
Ts: 3 is fine too but boring
Ts: 1 and 2 are a bit too much like plague carrier and bat
Captain Luffy: Those abilities could also be additions to versions of wisp, but they probably work better with pyromancer to start
Ts: Yeah I think another pyromancer is probably better
Captain Luffy: Though an investigation wisp could be nice, thinking about it. Like how warlock isn't part of pack
Ts: But is that particularly useful?
Captain Luffy: Mostly for wisp finding pyro team, instead of the other way around
Captain Luffy: And maybe in this hypothetical role, pyro chat would learn the invest results. Like clairvoyant fox
Ts:
Mostly for wisp finding pyro team, instead of the other way around
However Wisp doesnt want to powder pyros
Ts: so this doesnt really seem to work
Captain Luffy: good point
Ethan.: I like 4
Ethan.: especially if it can be caused by lynch
Ts: I think if it always triggers its a bit boring
Ts: then there's no strategy to it
Ts: I feel like there should be something to it to make people strategize how to work against it
Captain Luffy: could make it exclusively lynch or exclusively nk
Ts: I was thinking exclusively NK could be interesting
Captain Luffy: or maybe add in dk
Ts: yeah just kill
Ts: just not lynch
Ts: possibly something like: "When killed, the ... bursts into flame, igniting their attacker and all players they powdered" or something like that
Captain Luffy: killed in any way other than lynch. like how rangers desc phrases it
Ts: yeah
Ts: If it ignites the attacker as well just the role existing is very useful for scum
Ts: because then their enemies really have to consider whether to attack
Ts: this can even apply when that role isn't even ingame
Ts: And I think this is extra good for Pyro because Pyro is a fairly huge threat so they generally are something you want to kill quickly. But with this you might prioritize attacking the person you suspect of being wolf instead (or for the wolves a weaker townie)
Captain Luffy: what would it be called? kamikaze pyromancer?
Ts: absolutely not
Captain Luffy: x pyromancer (where x is some word)
Ts: Pyromaniac would fit but its too similiar I think
Ts:
x pyromancer (where x is some word)
I don't think we should do this, this naming scheme makes sense for the wolves where we have a ton of roles, but I doubt we're adding another 5 Pyromancers so it's probably best to give each a unique name
Captain Luffy: immolator? immolation means "to kill or destroy, especially by fire"
Ethan.:
If it ignites the attacker as well just the role existing is very useful for scum
even if the attacker is not powdered?
Ts: yea
Captain Luffy: would it be lame if it was called arsonist lol
@12Metatron:
@McTsts:
@12Metatron: