Open CrowdfordBot opened 1 year ago
huckhuck55: ie. N1 - link A and B N2 - link C and D (C and D would not be in the thread, but they would have their own thread channel) N3 - link C and B (they are now all in the same thread now.)
!Phantomtomic: Are the links not separate <:thonk:688530547857031236>
!Phantomtomic: The desc doesn’t specify
huckhuck55: so basically, if there were more than 1 sister, it would take some coordination to have a single large thread. but since they start not knowing eachother, they can not immediately coordinate. meaning, there may be a few threads and also, this would mean that town wouldnt want to share the info that they have been threaded, (would help the sisters find eachother)
huckhuck55: ill update the description to make it more clear
!Phantomtomic: Yeah but a single thread can still get really huge
!Phantomtomic: Which is major when all of them die
huckhuck55: thats true, but it would take a long time to make a large thread. in 3 nights, if there was only 1 sister, there could only be 4 people in the thread.
!Phantomtomic: … <:thonk:688530547857031236>
huckhuck55: unless they made multiple mini threads
!Phantomtomic: Wtf is a mini thread and a main thread
huckhuck55: if sister links 2 people together, they are now in a thread (playing with the fate weaver terminology.) then they would add another person to the thread the next night, either adding a new person to the existing thread, or linking 2 new people together. ie, 1 bigger thread, or 2 smaller threads.
!Phantomtomic: God huck I’m going to die from confusion
!Phantomtomic: Mini threads are extra channels??
huckhuck55: but we could also just have a rule that states, after a thread is started, they may only add onto the thread, not make multiple new ones.
huckhuck55: (sorry, i just woke up so my explaining may be a bit off.... sorry)
huckhuck55: adding onto the existing one would limit the amount of channels hosts would have to make. and also, being able to make multiple connections may be a bit too strong.
ABCD
vs
AB, CD, DF.
!Phantomtomic: Yea we shouldn’t be making so many whisper channels for each thread
huckhuck55: agreed.
!Phantomtomic: So basically you link 2 people and after that you add one new person every night to the main thread?
!Phantomtomic: Because the 2 player link is really confusing in the desc
huckhuck55: so the rule would be in that case. on night one, the sister may thread 2 people together, on the following night if the thread has not been destroyed, the sister picks 1 person to be added to the thread.
!Phantomtomic: Alr that’s better
!Phantomtomic: So if there’s 2 sisters and both add the same person the their thread instead everyone threaded will go into a shared thread and all be linked together?
huckhuck55: correct. both sisters in that case would join 1 channel, but they would both still be whispering (they would not learn eachothers identity)
!Phantomtomic: Huh idk how the bot works with this
!Phantomtomic: But hopefully it can do that
!Phantomtomic: So sisters only know each other if they thread each other
huckhuck55: correct.
!Phantomtomic: Hm
huckhuck55: but im okay with messing with that if it feels off
!Phantomtomic: How would snipping work
!Phantomtomic: Break a thread and kill?
huckhuck55: maybe they cant be threaded, they would just instead learn their identity and not add someone to the thread that night.
!Phantomtomic: Oh according to the desc snipping is a plain vanilla thread kill?
huckhuck55: (aka, they would receive a message saying, threading that person has failed)
!Phantomtomic: Without breaking the thread
huckhuck55: yeah, they can either A - add someone to the thread or B - cut a piece of the thread off (kill someone)
!Phantomtomic: Why would they want to use a vanilla kill on someone <:thonk:688530547857031236>
huckhuck55: cutting a piece off does not destroy the whole thread. only kills that one person
!Phantomtomic: A bit situational
huckhuck55: could be because that person is a TK or someone that could kill a sister.
!Phantomtomic: Isn’t it end phase
!Phantomtomic: So it’s even more situational
huckhuck55: not 100% on the scenarios where it would be useful, but the option is there incase they get info that makes them not want to wait until the thread is attacked.
huckhuck55: and yeah, it would be at the end of the night phase that they either cut the thread or add someone to the thread
!Phantomtomic: Err okay
huckhuck55: suggestions?
!Phantomtomic: It’s good but something’s kinda missing
!Phantomtomic: Feels like an aggro shep
huckhuck55: sisters of fates (Solo)
the sisters of fate weave threads between all living people and may choose to burn the thread at any given time.
actions each sister may either tether 2 people together or ignite the thread which burns at the end of EACH phase
details During the night phase, a sister may choose to tether people together making their souls connected, they are added to a private channel where they can communicate. (the sisters are added to the channel aswell). if anyone in the thread is killed, the entire thread is destroyed (everyone in the thread dies) if a sister chooses to burn the thread, they may start a fire at any link in the chain and choose a direction for the thread to burn. the first person at the chosen location dies immediately, and the thread will continue to burn at the beginning of each phase (day and night). the sisters are not disguised. if the thread is broken by any abilities, the thread will stop burning at that spot and must be reignited in order to have the thread burn further. if the thread is in 2 pieces and is not ignited, they must join the thread back together in order to burn it.
alternate option the sisters do not know eachother at the beginning of the game they both receive their own private channel with the people in the thread. if someone from one thread is connected to the other thread, the sisters both join the same chat. (chat becomes 1) if a sister attempts to add a sister to the thread, they are immediately notified and join a sister chat together.