Motivation and Context

Micro version upgrade in checkstyle (10.3.2 to 10.3.3).

Changes are at https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/releasenotes.html#Release_10.3.3 - nothing important for us, just maintaining currency.

Description

Update version in managed dependencies.

How Has This Been Tested?

Just a full build. This is a build-time tool, so seems sufficient.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

[X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

[X] My code follows the code style of this project.
[ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
[X] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
[X] All new and existing tests passed.

Codecov Report

Base: 91.03% // Head: 91.03% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (3a0f318) compared to base (1eb9f4f). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## 2.x #424 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 91.03% 91.03% Complexity 5610 5610 ========================================= Files 610 610 Lines 14571 14571 Branches 1379 1379 ========================================= Hits 13265 13265 Misses 1269 1269 Partials 37 37 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests-api | `98.67% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-api-ffmpeg | `15.85% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-awt | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-core | `98.44% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-geoid | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-mimd | `97.24% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0601 | `99.26% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0602 | `99.06% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0805 | `99.17% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0806 | `99.64% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0808 | `99.08% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0809 | `99.11% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0903-vmti | `98.79% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0903-vtrack | `97.09% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1108 | `99.66% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1206 | `99.59% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1301 | `98.91% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1403 | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1601 | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1602 | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1603 | `98.03% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1909 | `99.65% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=WestRidgeSystems#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=WestRidgeSystems). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=WestRidgeSystems)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

WestRidgeSystems / jmisb

chore: bump checkstyle to 10.3.3 #424