Motivation and Context

2.x CI is failing with a QA check for a vulnerable dependency. I don't think we are exposed to it, but its worth fixing.

Description

Update jackson-databind in managed dependencies. Use of 2.14.0-rc1 is undesirable, but 2.14.0 isn't released yet.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full build, including unit tests (which is one place we use Jackson).

Ran moving features example (which is the other place we use it).

Both OK.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

[x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

[x] My code follows the code style of this project.
[ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
[x] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
[x] All new and existing tests passed.

Codecov Report

Base: 91.75% // Head: 91.75% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (7c2cce0) compared to base (7c4619b). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## 2.x #432 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 91.75% 91.75% Complexity 5689 5689 ========================================= Files 614 614 Lines 14781 14781 Branches 1403 1403 ========================================= Hits 13562 13562 Misses 1151 1151 Partials 68 68 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests-api | `98.67% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-api-ffmpeg | `30.92% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-awt | `98.60% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-core | `98.44% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-geoid | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-mimd | `97.24% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0601 | `99.26% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0602 | `77.64% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0805 | `99.17% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0806 | `99.64% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0808 | `99.08% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0809 | `99.11% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0903-vmti | `98.79% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st0903-vtrack | `97.09% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1108 | `99.66% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1206 | `99.59% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1301 | `98.91% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1403 | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1601 | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1602 | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1603 | `98.03% <ø> (ø)` | | | unittests-st1909 | `99.65% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=WestRidgeSystems#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=WestRidgeSystems). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=WestRidgeSystems)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

WestRidgeSystems / jmisb

chore: bump Jackson Databind to 2.14.0-rc1 #432