Code Rubric

[Jowens96]

Goals

• [ ] Functional code
• [ ] Good responsiveness
• [ ] Nice design
• [ ] Fast performance
• [ ] Excellent accessibility

	0 points	1 points	2 points	3 points
Accessibility	No considerations	Added some alt attributes, nothing else	Just the basics: alt attributes, roles	Accessibility is well considered and tested
Code quality	Barely started	Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics	Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics	Well indented, fully valid, good semantics
Responsiveness	Only works on one screen size	Responsiveness is clunky	Good responsiveness overall	Completely responsive
Design	Unattractive and interferes with performance	Little design planning applied	Website looks good	Excellent, unique design
Performance	Extremely slow	Relatively slow performance	Good performance results	Excellent, fast results
Time Management	Unmanaged and chaotic resulting in poor work	Project progresses slowly and behind schedule	Milestones are met mostly with success	All milestones are completed on time

16/18

Accessibility - 1/3 We added aria labels to each of our graphic elements, however we do feel like we could have added more accessibility (i.e. skip links, button labels etc...) to make the page as accessible as possible.

Code Quality - 3/3 Our code is very well organized with proper indentation and proper formatting.

Responsiveness - 3/3 Our website is responsive on all screen sizes and works well in terms of layout and design.

Design - 3/3 Our design is unique and eye catching. The icons/graphics make the website more intriguing, as well as the hover states for the navigation items and buttons.

Performance -3/3 Website isn't slow at all and load very quickly.

Time Management - 3/3 All milestones were complete on time and each team member contributed a lot to the project.