Open DavePearce opened 8 years ago
There is currently a serious problem with the rules describing operator precedence. For example, they indicate that !x.f should parse as (!x).f which is definitely broken.
!x.f
(!x).f
Thanks to @richdougherty for pointing this out.
There is currently a serious problem with the rules describing operator precedence. For example, they indicate that
!x.fshould parse as(!x).fwhich is definitely broken.Thanks to @richdougherty for pointing this out.