Closed rajadain closed 6 years ago
From Scott Haag:
Based on conservations with BME,. I have updated the Development API to take in developed open space (code=21 from NLCD). This land cover category is being processed using the tile drain spot “tpload_tiledrain, tnload_tiledrain, and tssload_tiledrain”. I have made the changes on the Dev server only. Please advise if you have any questions.
Given the above, update the SRAT configuration to fetch the new land cover result row and display in the UI.
For this request: pequea-creek-srat-request.json.txt
Here is the response from before: pequea-creek-srat-response.json.txt
Here is the response after: pequea-creek-srat-response-dev.json.txt
As can be observed, while some of the numbers are different, there is no field for low density open space as expected. I'm writing to Scott and BME about this now.
We should use tiledrain
for Low-Density Open Space
, since that is currently not mapped to anything.
Since subbasin doesn't support "Low-Density Open Space", which as of #2944 represents the NLCD 21 area of land previously assigned to "Low-Density Mixed", the final results are different:
https://bl.ocks.org/rajadain/7f4a63d03623e334281e6fdac74b76ec
(where the left results are of the same HUC-10 on production, and the right on my local with #2944 applied).
From the notes in #2944:
Discuss with various parties what is the right solution to this issue.