Closed Wikunia closed 4 years ago
Merging #143 into master will decrease coverage by
0.05%
. The diff coverage is99.13%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #143 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.91% 98.86% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 31 31
Lines 2405 2473 +68
==========================================
+ Hits 2379 2445 +66
- Misses 26 28 +2
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
#unittests | 98.86% <99.13%> (-0.06%) |
:arrow_down: |
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/constraints/table.jl | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/hashes.jl | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/type_inits.jl | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/constraints/not_equal.jl | 94.44% <83.33%> (-1.86%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/ConstraintSolver.jl | 99.13% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/MOI_wrapper/constraints.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/MOI_wrapper/variables.jl | 99.45% <100.00%> (+0.02%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Variable.jl | 97.80% <100.00%> (+0.10%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/constraints/equal.jl | 96.51% <100.00%> (+0.85%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/types.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 2 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0bad1a0...42084dd. Read the comment docs.
If a == b
this is now using EqualSet
. The code includes bugfixes for the TableConstraint and for EqualSet.
Missing:
EqualSet with more variables is currently not pruning.
-O3
-O3
A ratio greater than 1.0
denotes a possible regression (marked with :x:), while a ratio less
than 1.0
denotes a possible improvement (marked with :white_check_mark:). Only significant results - results
that indicate possible regressions or improvements - are shown below (thus, an empty table means that all
benchmark results remained invariant between builds).
ID | time ratio | memory ratio |
---|---|---|
["eternity", "6x5"] |
1.11 (5%) :x: | 1.08 (1%) :x: |
["sudoku", "top95_81"] |
1.00 (5%) | 1.01 (1%) :x: |
Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
["eternity"]
["killer_sudoku"]
["lp"]
["sudoku"]
Julia Version 1.4.1
Commit 381693d3df* (2020-04-14 17:20 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
"Arch Linux"
uname: Linux 5.6.8-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:22:56 +0000 x86_64 unknown
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7600U CPU @ 2.80GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 2804 MHz 1329959 s 386535 s 389093 s 6105407 s 94409 s
#2 2837 MHz 1360086 s 389345 s 368172 s 1235568 s 22083 s
#3 2823 MHz 1601984 s 280378 s 370538 s 1189637 s 22307 s
#4 2863 MHz 1572428 s 258974 s 387068 s 1197165 s 35582 s
Memory: 15.393684387207031 GB (2496.91796875 MB free)
Uptime: 176421.0 sec
Load Avg: 1.4990234375 1.6552734375 1.61083984375
WORD_SIZE: 64
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-8.0.1 (ORCJIT, skylake)
Julia Version 1.4.1
Commit 381693d3df* (2020-04-14 17:20 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
"Arch Linux"
uname: Linux 5.6.8-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:22:56 +0000 x86_64 unknown
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7600U CPU @ 2.80GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 2840 MHz 1333705 s 386535 s 389688 s 6124642 s 94528 s
#2 2824 MHz 1363253 s 389345 s 368920 s 1255290 s 22114 s
#3 2881 MHz 1621475 s 280378 s 370926 s 1193464 s 22350 s
#4 2848 MHz 1574452 s 258974 s 387710 s 1218147 s 35607 s
Memory: 15.393684387207031 GB (2726.046875 MB free)
Uptime: 176658.0 sec
Load Avg: 1.91796875 1.96142578125 1.75
WORD_SIZE: 64
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-8.0.1 (ORCJIT, skylake)
Missing:
ptr
of the next change that needs to be processed in apply_changes!
I think it will be easier to check why it's sometimes slower and sometimes faster when having more PRs with smaller things:
set_init_fixes!
call_finished_pruning
equal
feasibility checkequal
correct pruningEach should be benchmarked independently. For that add another eternity benchmark i.e 5x5 getting all solutions
Replaced by #160
Implements #142 Should get some more testing. Not super sure yet :smile: