Closed Wikunia closed 4 years ago
Merging #171 into master will increase coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage is98.29%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #171 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 98.77% 98.79% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 32 34 +2
Lines 2619 2731 +112
==========================================
+ Hits 2587 2698 +111
- Misses 32 33 +1
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
#unittests | 98.79% <98.29%> (+0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/hashes.jl | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/MOI_wrapper/reified.jl | 90.47% <90.47%> (ø) |
|
src/ConstraintSolver.jl | 99.15% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/MOI_wrapper/constraints.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/constraints/indicator.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/constraints/reified.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/types.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/util.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 1 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e6d407c...2199c99. Read the comment docs.
Not sure yet whether anti prune is reasonable and seems like this would be needed for every constraint which seems like to much extra for this "special" case.
I think this can be used without anti prune first.
I think this can be merged when I had a look while writing a blog post :)
Implements #165 needs treatment of #170
prune_constraint!