Closed matbesancon closed 4 years ago
Ah yeah that makes sense. Thanks for the contribution. Will have a deeper look on Sunday evening/Monday.
Yes don't merge it just yet it still seems to be failing somewhere
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 2:42 PM Ole Kröger notifications@github.com wrote:
Ah yeah that makes sense. Thanks for the contribution. Will have a deeper look on Sunday evening/Monday.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Wikunia/ConstraintSolver.jl/pull/55?email_source=notifications&email_token=AB2FDMV4ML2YNGZG23OVZATQ5HEC7A5CNFSM4KFSA7NKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEIWCHCA#issuecomment-573318024, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2FDMVET6ZWKKOSMLN2633Q5HEC7ANCNFSM4KFSA7NA .
-- Mathieu Besançon
good to merge now
Nothing major here.
init()
was troubling because it looks like the init function of the module, which is creating side effects on it. It comes more from an OOP world, you just need to declare a constructor here, since it is what this function is doing. In case you want to keep init for a while, I added a deprecation macro, soCS.init()
is still available