The subscription part pushes a new tx to the queuebut inprocess_logs`, the tree address is unknown and therefore set to Null. The queue processor then skips that entry due to the null value. This seems odd to me. Am I missing something?
I changed the setup, such that I have separate streams per Tree (don't know if that's a good idea at scale, tho). Works better for me this way. any thoughts on this?
The
subscription
part pushes a new tx to the queuebut in
process_logs`, the tree address is unknown and therefore set to Null. The queue processor then skips that entry due to the null value. This seems odd to me. Am I missing something?I changed the setup, such that I have separate streams per Tree (don't know if that's a good idea at scale, tho). Works better for me this way. any thoughts on this?