Closed cpaniaguam closed 1 year ago
Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.06%
:tada:
Comparison is base (
65994ce
) 91.78% compared to head (1640a21
) 91.84%. Report is 1 commits behind head on main.:exclamation: Current head 1640a21 differs from pull request most recent head 748628e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 748628e to get more accurate results
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I was testing with
Pkg.project().version
instead ofVersionNumber(0,2,0)
. It seems to return the version fine and updating the test worked as well. However, it tries to activate a Julia REPL and IFT when I try to commit the changes.
I'll test this within IFTPipeline. Thanks!
I was testing with
Pkg.project().version
instead ofVersionNumber(0,2,0)
. It seems to return the version fine and updating the test worked as well. However, it tries to activate a Julia REPL and IFT when I try to commit the changes.I'll test this within IFTPipeline. Thanks!
When used within IFTPipeline it returns IFTPipeline's version :/. Going back to testing with hard-coding the version number.
@tdivoll I think hard coding the version number is probably the way to go.
@tdivoll I think hard coding the version number is probably the way to go.
@tdivoll Things working well within the container.
This approach is working well with IFTPipeline!