WinFF / winff

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/winff
213 stars 50 forks source link

WinFF crashes on Ubuntu 11.04 64bit #119

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The output of terminal is:

*****@*****-laptop:~$ winff

[WARNING] Out of OEM specific VK codes, changing to unassigned
[WARNING] Out of unassigned VK codes, assigning $FF

(winff:22274): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_hide: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET 
(widget)' failed
TApplication.HandleException Access violation
  Stack trace:
  $00007F16D4FD744E
exception at 00007F16D4FD744E:
Access violation.
TApplication.HandleException Access violation
  Stack trace:
  $00007F16DB155C2B
exception at 00007F16DB155C2B:
Access violation.
Ucciso

Original issue reported on code.google.com by regulus9...@gmail.com on 27 Jun 2011 at 1:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Thanks for reporting this issue. Are you using the package from us or did you 
install winff via the regular installer? If you use the plain Ubuntu package, 
please report it (also) to Ubuntu by calling "reportbug winff".

To help debug the problem, could you install winff-dbg and try to reproduce the 
problem. Please add the full backtrace/output.

Also, are you by any change using GTK with the QTcurve library? If so, please 
have a look at bug 55.

Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com on 27 Jun 2011 at 7:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I'm using Ubuntu 11.04 64bit and WinFF 1.3.2-2 via Paul Gevers PPA

WinFF crashes at startup without any actions.

Original comment by regulus9...@gmail.com on 27 Jun 2011 at 8:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
me = Paul Gevers

Anyway, can you install winff-dbg and get a full backtrace? Thanks.

Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com on 27 Jun 2011 at 8:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Did you manage to get a backtrace? 

Is your issue solved?

Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com on 14 Jul 2011 at 7:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
After two requests and more than two months we didn't receive the requested 
information. Therefore I set this bug to invalid. Please reopen if you can 
provide the requested information.

Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com on 4 Sep 2011 at 2:26