WinFF / winff

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/winff
213 stars 50 forks source link

wish list: allow multicore machine to process multiple video's at once #148

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Set the "threads" option in Winff to something bigger than 1 on a multicore 
machine.
2. Add multiple files to the list
3. Hit "Convert"

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The batch script generated by Winff will go through the files one by one and 
ffmpeg will use the appropriate amount of threads if the codec can handle it, 
but if the codec only does single threaded, Winff could use the other cores for 
other videos.

Unsure at the moment which codecs are effected.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by poipodec...@hotmail.com on 14 Jan 2012 at 8:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
You can do this by starting multiple conversions. Say you had 8 videos to 
convert and a quad core processor. You could add 2 of them and start it. Add 
another 2, etc..

Original comment by bgg...@gmail.com on 15 Jan 2012 at 4:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Is this worth pursuing?  I'm guessing not.  

Original comment by istoff@gmail.com on 18 Jan 2012 at 5:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I am not using a multi core system, but if you are using winff to convert loads 
of video's and you want it as fast as possible, it might save you quiet some 
time if you could use all the available cores. I guess that BiggMatt's solution 
does work, but users don't know and it is non-intuitive.

Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com on 18 Jan 2012 at 7:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Issue 202 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com on 9 Aug 2013 at 4:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I am using webm format and there is no multithreading in codec and winff is 
processing videos sequentially.

Original comment by djstr...@gmail.com on 9 Aug 2013 at 9:14