Closed xiaodaigh closed 4 years ago
I haven't researched it yet, but it should be feasible. rquery
is designed so that the connectors/adapters are supposed to be easy to build. Do you have a preferred diskframe starting guide?
https://diskframe.com/articles/intro-disk-frame.html
If u have rquery for data.table then I think disk.frame should be possible.
It's very dense and takes some time to understand. I think the read me can benefit from some dead simple examples. Like how does mutate and filter look like in rquery. Perhaps a side by side comparison in a table?
My group isn't looking to pursue adding a disk.frame
adaptor at this time.
To anybody who wants to write such an adaptor: I would suggest looking into rqdatatable
. rqdatatable
is essentially just a list of the rquery
verbs, each with a direct data.table
realization (so the whole package is just a side by side comparison). All one would have to do is not perform any of the data.frame
to data.table
casts or constructions (i.e. insist that all objects come to the methods as already disk.frame
classes).
Interesting in learning about the technical feasibility of connecting rquery to diskframe.com