Closed romainfrancois closed 4 years ago
Thank you for the pull requests. I'll put this on the TODO list. I have some other projects due, so I can't work on this at this time.
Also I am not certain tests have been run on this pull request as no such claim was made, and an unqualified row_number()
use also appears in the tests, so should have triggered a failure if run. To merge this I'll have to test on multiple versions of dplyr
, which will take some time.
The tests load dplyr
, this code doesn't.
Ah, sorry about that you are right. I now see I did that explicitly in the test. Thank you for the correction.
That was a bad practice on my part that I didn't remember doing. I will have to fix that also.
Thank you for the pull request, now merged.
Starting from
dplyr
1.0.0,row_number()
won't be magic, so packages have to specify where it's from.