Closed AndreMikulec closed 7 years ago
Thanks for your input!
I already have feedback that "stringsubs
" is considered unacceptable by some (for example). My current strategy is:
wrapr::let()
restricted only to symbol to symbol substitution (not general values).langsubs
", "stringsubs
", "subsubs
" in wrapr::let()
(so those that want or don't want one have an option).langsubs
" be the default procedure for wrapr::let()
as it is a very good compromise between power and safety.wrapr::seval()
(new, now available in the development version) for those that want general string based substitution (please see wrapr
issue 1 for some details and examples).I know this isn't exactly your preference, but I think it is a good compromise among some competing goals.
Thanks.
IMHO, keep "stringsubs" as the subsMethod default. People are already using it in this way. The method is not bad.
IMHO, keep all three subsMethod methods. People exist that need 'let' to work in different(new) ways.