Open lgrn opened 2 hours ago
It's more like a copywrong
license, seems more similar to that type. Hopefully this is a easy fix just remove copyleft
word from the wording of the license.
The whole license is a disappointment. I was a bit hyped when releasing the source code was announced but with this license I have zero interest in even having a deeper look into this.
The whole license is a disappointment. I was a bit hyped when releasing the source code was announced but with this license I have zero interest in even having a deeper look into this.
It is what it is, at least you can view the source code of Winamp and if you want to contribute you can do that too.
It is what it is, at least you can view the source code of Winamp and if you want to contribute you can do that too.
I would rather contribute my limited spare time to any of the audio players with real open source licenses.
LICENSE.md states that:
The license is neither free nor copyleft, but while you can argue that a "free license" means whatever you want it to, the same can not be said about "copyleft". The second sentence on Wikipedia states that:
The freedom to redistribute has been a part of the copyleft definition since the mid-1980s. Since the WCL explicitly forbids redistribution, it is not copyleft.