Closed LevaniVashadze closed 8 months ago
Hey Levani - could you send me the PGN that you analysed and the search depth you used? I'll have a look at it for myself.
[Event "levani_13 vs. MICRORAHUL"] [Site "Chess.com"] [Date "2024-02-11"] [White "levani_13"] [Black "MICRORAHUL"] [Result "0-1"] [WhiteElo "499"] [BlackElo "520"] [TimeControl "600"] [Termination "MICRORAHUL won by checkmate"]
I reviewed the game on chess.com and got this. It marks the move before the loss of the queen a blunder but the move while the queen is getting captured is marke as good. So i understand why the website categorized it as it did. https://www.chess.com/live/game/101250757290
The evaluation was -3.5 and then -5 after white hung the queen; at least according to Stockfish, a classification of "good" is intended behaviour here.
blob:https://chess.wintrcat.uk/cfe74a06-addb-4d40-b48e-3f27d263327f
I blundered my queen and my move still got classified as 'good'.
Great work on the website regardless.