FluentAssertions extensions are not open for extension

[chrischu]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Currently the FluentAssertion extensions offer a pretty small feature set, which would not be a problem by itself, but the fact that they are not very open for extension makes this really problematic.

Describe the solution you'd like I would like to for example access all the filtered requests on the WireMockAssertions object. That way I could write my own extension methods for it to for example assert that a request was using a specific path (currently only Url & AbsoluteUrl exist).

Describe alternatives you've considered As far as I can tell the only alternative is using reflection to access the private members of WireMockAssertions.

[StefH]

@chrischu I've updated the code for WireMockAssertions so that you now can create an extension method like:

using System;
using System.Linq;
using FluentAssertions;
using FluentAssertions.Execution;
using WireMock.FluentAssertions;

namespace WireMock.Net.Tests.FluentAssertions;

public static class WireMockAssertionsExtensions
{
    [CustomAssertion]
    public static AndWhichConstraint<WireMockAssertions, string> AtAbsoluteUrl2(this WireMockAssertions assertions,
        string absoluteUrl, string because = "", params object[] becauseArgs)
    {
        var (filter, condition) = assertions.BuildFilterAndCondition(request => string.Equals(request.AbsoluteUrl, absoluteUrl, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));

        Execute.Assertion
            .BecauseOf(because, becauseArgs)
            .Given(() => assertions.RequestMessages)
            .ForCondition(requests => assertions.CallsCount == 0 || requests.Any())
            .FailWith(
                "Expected {context:wiremockserver} to have been called at address matching the absolute url {0}{reason}, but no calls were made.",
                absoluteUrl
            )
            .Then
            .ForCondition(condition)
            .FailWith(
                "Expected {context:wiremockserver} to have been called at address matching the absolute url {0}{reason}, but didn't find it among the calls to {1}.",
                _ => absoluteUrl,
                requests => requests.Select(request => request.AbsoluteUrl)
            );

        assertions.FilterRequestMessages(filter);

        return new AndWhichConstraint<WireMockAssertions, string>(assertions, absoluteUrl);
    }
}

Note that the RequestMessages, BuildFilterAndCondition and FilterRequestMessages are made public so these can be used in the extension methods.

Would this fix your issue?

---

And if you have any useful default fliuent extensions, you can also add these to this project using a PR.

[chrischu]

Oh sorry I just saw the comment, yes this looks perfect, thank you!