Closed alexcpn closed 2 months ago
With the clutter loss correction form #58 this is now matching much more closely though there is a slight delta
[INFO] Expected Frequency
[INFO] 5925-6108,upperBound:23.0 nominalValue:23.0
[INFO] 6108-6139,upperBound:9.5 nominalValue:7.5
[INFO] 6139-6300,upperBound:23.0 nominalValue:23.0
[INFO] 6300-6331,upperBound:18.4 nominalValue:16.4
[INFO] 6331-6425,upperBound:23.0 nominalValue:23.0
[INFO] 6525-6650,upperBound:23.0 nominalValue:23.0
[INFO] 6676-6875,upperBound:23.0 nominalValue:23.0
[INFO] Calculated Frequency
[INFO] 5925.0-5930.025 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 5930.025-6108.1 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6108.1-6138.1 psd: 10.785481766089532
[INFO] 6138.1-6167.925 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6167.925-6182.065 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6182.065-6300.84 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6300.84-6330.84 psd: 20.623333589751383
[INFO] 6330.84-6419.965 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6419.965-6425.0 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6525.0-6540.0 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6540.0-6570.0 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6570.0-6580.0 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6580.0-6650.0 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6650.0-6676 psd: 0
[INFO] 6676-6870.0 psd: 23.0
[INFO] 6870.0-6875.0 psd: 23.0
[ERROR] gc=131 cn=33,freq_range=(6105.0, 6125.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 20.5, 'upperBound': 22.5} calc_eirp=23.8 diff=1.30
[ERROR] gc=131 cn=37,freq_range=(6125.0, 6145.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 20.5, 'upperBound': 22.5} calc_eirp=23.8 diff=1.30
[ERROR] gc=131 cn=69,freq_range=(6285.0, 6305.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 29.4, 'upperBound': 31.4} calc_eirp=33.63 diff=2.23
[ERROR] gc=131 cn=73,freq_range=(6305.0, 6325.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 29.4, 'upperBound': 31.4} calc_eirp=33.63 diff=2.23
[ERROR] gc=131 cn=77,freq_range=(6325.0, 6345.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 29.4, 'upperBound': 31.4} calc_eirp=33.63 diff=2.23
[ERROR] gc=132 cn=35,freq_range=(6105.0, 6145.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 23.5, 'upperBound': 25.5} calc_eirp=26.81 diff=1.31
[ERROR] gc=132 cn=67,freq_range=(6265.0, 6305.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 32.4, 'upperBound': 34.4} calc_eirp=36.0 diff=1.60
[ERROR] gc=132 cn=75,freq_range=(6305.0, 6345.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 32.4, 'upperBound': 34.4} calc_eirp=36.0 diff=1.60
[ERROR] gc=133 cn=39,freq_range=(6105.0, 6185.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 26.5, 'upperBound': 28.5} calc_eirp=29.82 diff=1.32
[ERROR] gc=134 cn=47,freq_range=(6105.0, 6265.0) expected_eirp={'nominalValue': 29.6, 'upperBound': 31.6} calc_eirp=32.83 diff=1.23
[INFO] Time in Milliseconds 0:06:15.172058, processed_count=398160
After checking AFCS.SIP.5 expected test results results multiple times, there is a large discrepancy in the following bands
Calculated: 6360.14-6390.14 psd: 15.212059353354135 - Missed in the test harness Expected 6331-6425,upperBound:23.0 nominalValue:23.0 (very high)
Calculated: 6300.84-6330.84 psd: -10.73492239011621 Expected: 6300-6331,upperBound:18.4 nominalValue:16.4 (very high)
Calculated: 6108.1-6138.1 psd: -19.62399344640788 Expected: 6108-6139,upperBound:9.5 nominalValue:7.5 (very high)
Logs below
Final calculation
For each band
(6108.1, 6138.1)
frequency_range: (6300.84, 6330.84)
frequency_range: (6360.14, 6390.14)
Also attaching the entire logs out_AFCS.SIP.5_2024-04-22 13:17:31.140909.zip