search

Wireless-Innovation-Forum / 6-GHz-AFC

This repository contains code and data for testing the compliance of Automated Frequency Coordinator (AFC) software. The AFC is defined by the FCC in proceeding 18-295 on Unlicensed Use of the 6 GHz Band. This repository contains procedures, documentation, and tests for such software, and for the devices authorized by it. To contribute, please first read the CONTRIBUTING file in the repository for instructions.
14 stars 3 forks source link

109/128 test cases fail after databases from Wi-FiTestSuite are applied #65

Open sambk opened 3 days ago

sambk commented 3 days ago

Hi, According to SUT harness document, I expect that all test cases will pass after I apply all databases from https://github.com/Wi-FiTestSuite/6GHz-AFC on my AFC server system, including:

Unfortunately, the number of failed cases are even more than the latest production database:

2024-11-27 23:47:24,608 - Results - DEBUG: Full Test Results: Expected results: AFCS.FSP.42, AFCS.FSP.49, AFCS.FSP.57, AFCS.FSP.64, AFCS.FSP.72, AFCS.FSP.74, AFCS.FSP.86, AFCS.FSP.89, AFCS.FSP.93, AFCS.FSP.94, AFCS.IBP.2, AFCS.SRS.1, AFCS.URS.1, AFCS.URS.2, AFCS.URS.3, AFCS.URS.4, AFCS.URS.5, AFCS.URS.6, AFCS.URS.7 Unexpected results: AFCS.FSP.1, AFCS.FSP.10, AFCS.FSP.100, AFCS.FSP.11, AFCS.FSP.12, AFCS.FSP.13, AFCS.FSP.14, AFCS.FSP.15, AFCS.FSP.16, AFCS.FSP.17, AFCS.FSP.18, AFCS.FSP.19, AFCS.FSP.2, AFCS.FSP.20, AFCS.FSP.21, AFCS.FSP.22, AFCS.FSP.23, AFCS.FSP.24, AFCS.FSP.25, AFCS.FSP.26, AFCS.FSP.27, AFCS.FSP.28, AFCS.FSP.29, AFCS.FSP.3, AFCS.FSP.30, AFCS.FSP.31, AFCS.FSP.32, AFCS.FSP.33, AFCS.FSP.34, AFCS.FSP.35, AFCS.FSP.36, AFCS.FSP.37, AFCS.FSP.38, AFCS.FSP.39, AFCS.FSP.4, AFCS.FSP.40, AFCS.FSP.41, AFCS.FSP.43, AFCS.FSP.44, AFCS.FSP.45, AFCS.FSP.46, AFCS.FSP.47, AFCS.FSP.48, AFCS.FSP.5, AFCS.FSP.50, AFCS.FSP.51, AFCS.FSP.52, AFCS.FSP.53, AFCS.FSP.54, AFCS.FSP.55, AFCS.FSP.56, AFCS.FSP.58, AFCS.FSP.59, AFCS.FSP.6, AFCS.FSP.60, AFCS.FSP.61, AFCS.FSP.62, AFCS.FSP.63, AFCS.FSP.65, AFCS.FSP.66, AFCS.FSP.67, AFCS.FSP.68, AFCS.FSP.69, AFCS.FSP.7, AFCS.FSP.70, AFCS.FSP.71, AFCS.FSP.73, AFCS.FSP.75, AFCS.FSP.76, AFCS.FSP.77, AFCS.FSP.78, AFCS.FSP.79, AFCS.FSP.8, AFCS.FSP.80, AFCS.FSP.81, AFCS.FSP.82, AFCS.FSP.83, AFCS.FSP.84, AFCS.FSP.85, AFCS.FSP.87, AFCS.FSP.88, AFCS.FSP.9, AFCS.FSP.90, AFCS.FSP.91, AFCS.FSP.92, AFCS.FSP.95, AFCS.FSP.96, AFCS.FSP.97, AFCS.FSP.98, AFCS.FSP.99, AFCS.IBP.1, AFCS.IBP.3, AFCS.IBP.4, AFCS.SIP.1, AFCS.SIP.10, AFCS.SIP.11, AFCS.SIP.12, AFCS.SIP.13, AFCS.SIP.14, AFCS.SIP.15, AFCS.SIP.16, AFCS.SIP.2, AFCS.SIP.3, AFCS.SIP.4, AFCS.SIP.5, AFCS.SIP.6, AFCS.SIP.7, AFCS.SIP.8, AFCS.SIP.9 Skipped tests: AFCS.IBP.5, AFCS.IBP.6, AFCS.IBP.7, AFCS.IBP.8 2024-11-27 23:47:24,608 - Results - INFO: Test Summary: Expected results: 19 Unexpected results: 109 Skipped tests: 4

Most of test cases fails because the response values are bigger than the upper threshold (22.9 dBm/MHz for PSD or 36 dBm for EIRP). Looks like the file of ULS .sqlite3 is not very correct.

Could anyone please give me any suggestion? Did I do anything wrong or is my expectation wrong?

Thank you, Pham Viet Sam