Open wiscarlab opened 5 years ago
this above bug has been fixed. Additional requests within the flux pipeline include a couple modifications to the "bracketing" model:
1) This model only brackets in the x directon, e.g. calculates a predicted J for wells 2 and 8 using 1,3 and 7,9 respectively. We also need it to bracket in the y direction (e.g. calculate a predicted J for wells 4 and 6 using 1,7 and 3,9 respectively).
2) This model should only display a predicted J for wells in between the two bracketing wells, not the bracketing wells themselves, those should be left blank. In the case of our 3x3 disc, the corner wells should always be blank when using the bracketing model.
active branch=release/py3/v18.2
active analyses=UW146:AS1-01A,UW146:AS1-02A,UW146:AS1-03A,UW146:AS1-04A,UW146:AS1-05A,UW146:AS3-01A,UW146:AS3-02A,UW146:AS3-03A,UW146:AS3-04A,UW146:AS3-05A,UW146:AS3-06A,UW146:AS3-07A,UW146:AS7-01A,UW146:AS7-02A,UW146:AS7-03A,UW146:AS7-04A,UW146:AS7-05A,UW146:AS9-01A,UW146:AS9-02A,UW146:AS9-03A,UW146:AS9-04A,UW146:AS9-05A
description="right before "Fit Flux UW146" node. Trying for the ACs in disk A of that irradiaiton"
Traceback