Validation loss on pretraining?[Feature request]

[james20141606]

feature

Hi, I am trying to redo the pretrain step as you described in the readme doc. The training loss converges pretty fast. I find the logs in wandb and it turned out to be only containing the training loss. I wonder if you could add other metrics, like validation loss and perplexity.

Thanks a lot!

[mu-cai]

Thanks for the question. However, I do not have validation dataset incorporated during training. Feel free to try it by your own!

[james20141606]

Thanks for your reply! By the way do you have validation data in the finetuning stage?

[james20141606]

And I have two extra questions which I am confused with:

• I tried to pretrain the vip-llava using either your provided data or my custom data and they both converge very fast. The loss plateaus within 5 hrs on one single A100. Does that happen to your experiments as well?
• To create a vip-llava model on a specific domain, for example satellite data. Do you think we should pretrain vip-llava using satellite data and then ft with instructions? Or do you think it is enough to load your pretrained checkpoint and ft on custom data? Do you have any intuitions on it? I would appreciate it a lot if you could answer my questions. Thanks!

[mu-cai]

1. Yes, LLMs's loss decrease very fast.
2. I think either works, and all of those depends on the quality and quantity of your data!