search

WolframResearch / WolframLanguageForJupyter

Wolfram Language kernel for Jupyter notebooks
MIT License
1.03k stars 124 forks source link

Request For Comments: Make common idioms for setting a persistent format type for output effective #48

Closed cc-wr closed 5 years ago

cc-wr commented 5 years ago

This a "Request For Comments/Consensus"-type issue for the pull request #46.

46 makes changes to assure that, to an extent, the following common idioms for setting a persistent format type (see also #45) work:

(After #46, this last command only applies to outputs that would have been rasterized by the Front End before TraditionalForm was applied.)

Some of these changes involve the implementation of various standard hooks in the WolframLanguageForJupyter evaluation loop (see also #47).

The hooks implemented, in the attached pull request, are:

Any relevant comments (e.g., support, complaints, objections, suggested improvements) are welcome.

It may also be helpful if you provide something like the following in your comment:

  • +2 : I am happy with this proposal, and I will argue for it
  • +1 : I am happy with this proposal, but will not argue for it
  • 0 : I have no opinion
  • -1 : I am not happy with this proposal, but will not argue against it
  • -2 : I am not happy with this proposal, and I will argue against it

https://xenproject.org/developers/governance/#expressingopinion

cc-wr commented 5 years ago

This request ends in one week.

cc-wr commented 5 years ago

Since no comments were registered, I will go ahead and merge #46.

vipa7070 commented 4 years ago

I'm sorry I don't speak English very well and I don't understand very well how this web site work but I think that the issue in the exponent should have been solved, therefore: +2 : I am happy with this proposal.