Open anomiex opened 2 years ago
What is your proposed solution?
Change these dependencies into peer dependencies with appropriate ranges (preferably
>=
rather than^
), as recommended by Eslint for sharable configs.
Yes, it makes sense to follow the recommendation. We probably need to switch to npm 8/yarn/pnpm first or list them explicitly in Gutenberg to ensure that those dependencies get installed with npm 6.
What problem does this address?
Having these other plugins as dependencies of
@wordpress/eslint-plugin
only works due to npm/yarn/pnpm "hoisting" dependencies. If this hoisting does not happen (e.g. with yarn's PnP or pnpm configured to disable the default compatibility hoisting that's intended to support broken dependencies like this), eslint does not find the depended plugins.If a package such as @rushstack/eslint-patch is used to improve eslint's plugin loading, we can easily run into the opposite problem: if plugins used by
@wordpress/eslint-plugin
are also used directly, we can easily wind up with a version conflict (for example, if the local config uses eslint-plugin-prettier 4.0.0 while@wordpress/eslint-plugin
is still depending on^3.3.0
).What is your proposed solution?
Change these dependencies into peer dependencies with appropriate ranges (preferably
>=
rather than^
), as recommended by Eslint for sharable configs.