Closed vanaukenk closed 5 years ago
All of the strains mentioned were picked up for 50093, however it looks like we had one false positive, DC1.
Perhaps this is coming from a link to the Supplemental materials in the paper's Footnotes?
Footnotes Supplemental material is available online at www.genetics.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1534/genetics.116.194308/-/DC1.
Yep, and there's nothing we can do for now. We need to identify sections in the papers and assign different weights to matches in different parts of the text if we want to avoid these false positives
All of the strains mentioned were picked up for 50093, however it looks like we had one false positive, DC1.
Perhaps this is coming from a link to the Supplemental materials in the paper's Footnotes?
Footnotes Supplemental material is available online at www.genetics.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1534/genetics.116.194308/-/DC1.