Closed mgrbyte closed 8 years ago
Renaming as two-point-data is fine, genetically more accurate in fact.
So is this something that needs to be done in the annotated models file or both?
At least in the annotated models; would not need the special syntax (^) if applied to the ACeDB model first.
@Paul-Davis @tuli Is this something that could go into WS255?
I believe so. @Paul-Davis would you like me to write a proposal to models?
@tuli is 2-point-data used in acedb tools/displays where this change would break the functionality?
;)
Do you mean like the genetic map?
What do you mean custom? Isn't everything in acedb custom made?
@tuli yes things like genetic map.
I don't believe this is resolved??!
2-point-data model hasn't been touched since before you collapsed the WSXYZ model files down into a single file for tracking differences (version control vs versions of the file).
Looks like it was actually previously done (as far back as WS249) https://github.com/WormBase/pseudoace/blame/master/models/models.wrm.annot#L897
I'll close it again then as it was a non-issues ;)
Names starting with non-alphabetic characters cause issues with datalog queries.
We should re-name any class/attribute names in the annotated ACeDB models accordingly.
2-point-data
is the only one I'm aware of.