Closed Paul-Davis closed 8 years ago
I support the proposal, but only comment is that for consistency five_prime could be 5_prime or something.
We have UTR_3 and UTR_5 in #Molecular_change. Obviously it's clear that 3 means 3 prime (or 3'), and it would work to have Truncated 5 #Evidence
Could we have Truncated_5 Truncated_3
??
I would like to avoid having integers as tags. If it has to be numbers, i would rather do:
Truncated 5_prime_truncated #Evidence
3_prime_truncated #Evidence
Frameshifts UNIQUE Int
The "Truncated" parent disappears in the Datomic conversion, and the only purpose it serves (as far as I can tell) is Acedb models readability. Can we not simply do:
five_prime_truncated three_prime_truncated
?
Yes this would simplify the model.wrm_anno conversion for Datomic imports, so just have additional top level attributes is nice. @epaule is this ok with you.
?Pseudogene Attributes Transcribed #Evidence
Fragment #Evidence
SubType UNIQUE processed_pseudogene #Evidence
unprocessed_pseudogene #Evidence
5_prime_truncated #Evidence
3_prime_truncated #Evidence
Frameshifts UNIQUE Int
@tuli 's original suggestion is more consistent with other 5/3-containing tags in the model:
Truncated_5 Truncated_3
Final itteration: Ok @epaule
?Pseudogene Attributes Transcribed #Evidence
Fragment #Evidence
SubType UNIQUE processed_pseudogene #Evidence
unprocessed_pseudogene #Evidence
Truncated_5 #Evidence
Truncated_3 #Evidence
Frameshifts UNIQUE Int
looks fine.
Proposed by: Michael Background: Brugia contains horizontally transferred genes. As the author spent quite a bit of work to add additional information for pseudogenes, I would like to add them as tags to the Pseudogene class. Namely: