Closed secworks closed 11 months ago
Nope, that is the correct name of that ECP5 primitive
See notes here: https://github.com/tomverbeure/ecp5_jtag
It's a bit of an unfortunate name, but if you've already had JTAGA through JTAGF then what follows is inevitable.
Ah, my mistake, sorry.
There is a minor spelling in the file: "JTAGG" should be "JTAG".
https://github.com/Wren6991/Hazard3/blob/e8b4578b4003d838f006dca00b5fea5852e4ab98/example_soc/fpga/fpga_ulx3s.f#L9C48-L9C53