CNAM-359: Conv sccs pio experiments

[ysebiat]

New CNAM-359 PR. This replaces the other one.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #175 into master will increase coverage by 0.17%. The diff coverage is 96.29%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #175      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.21%   93.38%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         136      136              
  Lines        1562     1573      +11     
  Branches       54       50       -4     
==========================================
+ Hits         1456     1469      +13     
+ Misses        106      104       -2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../transformers/exposures/ExposuresTransformer.scala	100% <ø> (ø)	:arrow_up:
...p/cnam/study/pioglitazone/PioglitazoneConfig.scala	100% <ø> (ø)	:arrow_up:
...e/cmap/cnam/util/DrugEventsTransformerHelper.scala	85.71% <ø> (ø)	:arrow_up:
...l/transformers/follow_up/FollowUpTransformer.scala	100% <100%> (ø)	:arrow_up:
...hnique/cmap/cnam/etl/sources/data/DcirSource.scala	100% <100%> (ø)	:arrow_up:
...rmers/exposures/UnlimitedExposurePeriodAdder.scala	100% <100%> (ø)	:arrow_up:
...map/cnam/etl/filters/PatientFiltersImplicits.scala	98.11% <100%> (+0.81%)	:arrow_up:
...map/cnam/etl/transformers/follow_up/FollowUp.scala	33.33% <50%> (+8.33%)	:arrow_up:

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update dfa2c0d...76bfa64. Read the comment docs.

[MaryanMorel]

...map/cnam/etl/transformers/follow_up/FollowUp.scala	33.33% <50%> (+8.33%)

Why does this class have such a low coverage (compared to other)?