Closed BlackDog86 closed 2 weeks ago
I'm sorry, but this still seems to remove Start Issue / End Issue tags in XComUnitPawn, what's up with that?
I'm sorry, but this still seems to remove Start Issue / End Issue tags in XComUnitPawn, what's up with that?
I explained this in the comment above -
The original file had this:
issue # X
<some code>
end issue # X <---- remove this
issue # X again <----- remove this
<some code>
end issue # X
I simply changed to
issue #x
<some code>
end issue #x
I see.
The purpose of ref:Bugfixes docs is to be user-facing. As in, it should be treated as an entry in a changelog that explains the bug that is being fixed to Highlander users. If it's just a comment that explains to Highlander maintainers and Highlander-using mod authors, it doesn't need a docs entry.
Something like "Moved earlier so we can call SetAppearance() whether a new pawn is created or not" doesn't really explain what is being fixed here, so if you could reword it a bit, it would be appreciated.
I see.
The purpose of ref:Bugfixes docs is to be user-facing. As in, it should be treated as an entry in a changelog that explains the bug that is being fixed to Highlander users. If it's just a comment that explains to Highlander maintainers and Highlander-using mod authors, it doesn't need a docs entry.
Something like "Moved earlier so we can call SetAppearance() whether a new pawn is created or not" doesn't really explain what is being fixed here, so if you could reword it a bit, it would be appreciated.
Yep, I see what you mean. That should be done now.
Adds docs for Issue #380