Closed hallambaker closed 4 years ago
Thanks for bringing this up! I agree that this would be good to have - it's been on our to-do list for a while.. I'll push it more towards the top of my own stack, and will keep you posted!
Thanks.
In case you are interested, it is so that I can check the Quantum Secure recovery box on the new user-centered PKI I am currently working on. This is where it will fit:
http://mathmesh.com/Documents/draft-hallambaker-mesh-advanced.html
The idea is that if we do hit quantum computing insecurity, then we will need to switch to symmetric techniques. And having a QCR signature scheme at least gives us a bootstrap.
My gut feeling is that Quantum computing won't scale. Or at least we are 30-100 years off working out how to make it scale. It may well require completely different physical principles to keep quantum systems coherent for macro timescales.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Joost Rijneveld notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up! I agree that this would be good to have - it's been on our to-do list for a while.. I'll push it more towards the top of my own stack, and will keep you posted!
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/joostrijneveld/xmss-reference/issues/5#issuecomment-418587789, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB8lUOpzQvy0ly75BQ26uwoivIMLuCC-ks5uX0SngaJpZM4WaG2f .
Resolved by #11
I am considering adding at least the XMSS-MT verify code path to OpenSSL.. Is there any chance of doing this in a similar manner to the LMS/HSS RFC (See https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8554.html#appendix-F)? I assume that was what was meant by "Could you provide a set of test vectors separate from the code?"
I would like to implement in C#. To do this I need test vectors.
I do not want to look at your code for obvious reasons - I want to see if the spec is clear enough to implement independently.