Closed Bronek closed 2 months ago
@gregtatcam I agree, please view it here: https://github.com/Bronek/rippled/pull/1
Qualitatively, the LOB offers are being used when one side of the AMM is being overwhelmed by sendmax
parameter. This makes sense because LOB provides better quality offers whereas the AMM becomes capital-inefficient towards extremities.
However, I'm not familiar enough with the synthetic offer generation process to validate the actual numbers myself. Let me know if I can improve the validation further.
Attention: Patch coverage is 72.05882%
with 19 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 76.98%. Comparing base (
659bd99
) to head (34ff8e7
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/test/app/AMM_test.cpp | 72.05% | 18 Missing and 1 partial :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
High Level Overview of Change
Unit tests for https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/pull/4968
Context of Change
Type of Change
.gitignore
, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)