search

XSEDE / oauth-ssh

SSH with Globus Auth
Apache License 2.0
28 stars 11 forks source link

adding support for SciTokens https://scitokens.org/ #69

Closed ag012 closed 3 years ago

ag012 commented 4 years ago

What is auth_method? Is it already split by space? auth_method is a member of config. config is a struct preprocessed in config.c

Probably just need this to be "break", since it will break out of the loop right to the goto statement. Thanks for the comment. I've change that to break.

ag012 commented 4 years ago

Note that rewrite _cmd_login 78f9c13 added a non-optional configuration field and it should be mentioned outside of the scitokens section in readme

rpwagner commented 4 years ago

Thanks @ag012! I submitted a corresponding XSEDE activity for this feature at https://software.xsede.org/display/xci-694.

@jbasney this may be both overly pedantic and not be the right place to discuss this, but on the XSEDE activity the term "proprietary" seems inappropriate for Globus Auth OAuth 2.0 Tokens. They're opaque bearer tokens based on IETF RFC 7662. Opaque is not the same as proprietary.

jbasney commented 4 years ago

@jbasney this may be both overly pedantic and not be the right place to discuss this, but on the XSEDE activity the term "proprietary" seems inappropriate for Globus Auth OAuth 2.0 Tokens. They're opaque bearer tokens based on IETF RFC 7662. Opaque is not the same as proprietary.

I'm happy to be corrected. It's my understanding that only tokens issued by globus.org are currently accepted by oauth-ssh, but I agree it should be possible to support any issuers of opaque bearer tokens that comply with RFC 7662 by adding a few new oauth-ssh configuration options. I opened issue #70 for it. In that case, I'd agree the term "proprietary" would no longer be appropriate.

In any case, I removed "proprietary" from the description at https://software.xsede.org/display/xci-694.

rpwagner commented 4 years ago

Thanks, Jim. I'll contribute to #70. Well, participate, at least.

JasonAlt commented 3 years ago

If this is ready approved and ready for merge, it'll need the 'draft' flag changed.

jbasney commented 3 years ago

Who can remove the draft flag? Here's what I see:

image