As I pointed out in #6, there are some inconsistencies in XTheadMemIdx.
XTheadFMemIdx does not have such inconsistencies in the manual but replacing rs1 with (rs1) may be an option to keep consistency with other RISC-V instructions.
Is not having parens around rs1 is intentional? If not, we should fix both the manual and GNU Binutils (I can handle the GNU Binutils part).
As I pointed out in #6, there are some inconsistencies in
XTheadMemIdx
.XTheadFMemIdx
does not have such inconsistencies in the manual but replacingrs1
with(rs1)
may be an option to keep consistency with other RISC-V instructions.Is not having parens around
rs1
is intentional? If not, we should fix both the manual and GNU Binutils (I can handle the GNU Binutils part).