Closed apchytr closed 1 month ago
codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot]
commented
1 month ago PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.
| β±οΈ Estimated effort to review: 2 π΅π΅βͺβͺβͺ |
| π Score: 95 |
| π§ͺ PR contains tests |
| π No security concerns identified |
| β‘ No key issues to review |
codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot]
commented
1 month ago PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.
| Category | Suggestion | Score |
| Performance |
Use a more efficient method for parameter copying in the adjoint and dual methods___ **Consider using a more efficient method to copy parameters, such as a shallow copy ora dedicated method for parameter copying. This can improve performance, especially for components with many parameters.** [mrmustard/lab_dev/circuit_components.py [169-170]](https://github.com/XanaduAI/MrMustard/pull/492/files#diff-05cc8f1f470b3eab23b8a8b1b1a628a97c87852722ea6b5408e1bb70efd4ab72R169-R170) ```diff -for param in self.parameter_set.all_parameters.values(): - ret._add_parameter(param) +ret._copy_parameters_from(self) ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion** Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8Why: The suggestion to use a more efficient method for parameter copying is valid and can improve performance, especially for components with many parameters. It addresses a potential performance bottleneck in the code. | 8 |
| Enhancement |
Use a more concise and potentially more efficient method for equality comparison___ **Consider usingall() with generator expressions for a more concise and potentially more efficient equality check. This approach can short-circuit the comparison as soon as a mismatch is found.** [mrmustard/math/parameter_set.py [224-226]](https://github.com/XanaduAI/MrMustard/pull/492/files#diff-84eeda43424564d268538955f7993c6c8ce692b04fe55dd4e644adea4a06aea0R224-R226) ```diff -return ( - self._names == other._names - and self._constants == other._constants - and self._variables == other._variables +return all( + getattr(self, attr) == getattr(other, attr) + for attr in ('_names', '_constants', '_variables') ) ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion** Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7Why: The suggestion to use `all()` with generator expressions for equality checks is a valid enhancement. It can make the code more concise and potentially improve performance by short-circuiting on the first mismatch. | 7 |
Add tests for edge cases in parameter set equality comparison___ **Consider adding tests for edge cases, such as comparing empty parameter sets orparameter sets with different orders of parameters. This will ensure the equality comparison is robust across various scenarios.** [tests/test_math/test_parameter_set.py [129-135]](https://github.com/XanaduAI/MrMustard/pull/492/files#diff-073ffa66b1738e2977f58d9fd433691c911f48748ee3c54485c819a8debc2206R129-R135) ```diff assert ps1 == ps2 - +assert ps2 == ps1 # Test symmetry +assert ParameterSet() == ParameterSet() # Test empty sets +ps4 = ParameterSet() +ps4.add_parameter(var1) +ps4.add_parameter(const1) +assert ps3 == ps4 # Test different order of parameters assert ps1 != ps3 ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion** Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7Why: The suggestion to add tests for edge cases is a good enhancement. It ensures the robustness of the equality comparison across various scenarios, which is important for maintaining code reliability. However, it is not addressing a critical issue. | 7 | |
Add more detailed assertions for parameter set equality in tests___ **Consider adding more specific assertions to test the individual parameters withinthe parameter sets. This will provide more detailed verification of the parameter copying process.** [tests/test_lab_dev/test_circuit_components.py [124]](https://github.com/XanaduAI/MrMustard/pull/492/files#diff-cf594d34002781ecbd6f00d55be035f5d6821af5cfde94038830e0e3ea5f5bc3R124-R124) ```diff assert d1_adj.parameter_set == d1.parameter_set +for param_name, param in d1.parameter_set.all_parameters.items(): + assert param_name in d1_adj.parameter_set.all_parameters + assert d1_adj.parameter_set.all_parameters[param_name] == param ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion** Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6Why: Adding more specific assertions provides a more thorough verification of the parameter copying process, enhancing the robustness of the tests. However, it's a minor enhancement rather than a critical fix. | 6 |
π‘ Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat
codecov[bot]
commented
1 month ago All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 89.73%. Comparing base (
068bdf7) to head (0af8230).
apchytr
User description
Context: Sometimes it's useful to keep the parameter set of a circuit component after calling
.dualor.adjoint. E.g. in the sampler if we wish to store POVM elements asState.dualand access their parametersdual.phi.value.Description of the Change:
.dualand.adjointreturn a CC with the parameters of the original CCPR Type
enhancement, tests
Description
adjointanddualmethods inCircuitComponentto retain the original parameters.ParameterSetto allow direct comparison.Changes walkthrough π
circuit_components.py
Preserve parameters in `adjoint` and `dual` methodsmrmustard/lab_dev/circuit_components.py
adjointanddualmethods.CircuitComponent.parameter_set.py
Add equality comparison for `ParameterSet`mrmustard/math/parameter_set.py
__eq__method forParameterSet.ParameterSetobjects.test_circuit_components.py
Test parameter retention in `adjoint` and `dual`tests/test_lab_dev/test_circuit_components.py
adjointanddual.test_circuits.py
Update circuit representation tests for parameter displaytests/test_lab_dev/test_circuits.py
test_parameter_set.py
Test equality method in `ParameterSet`tests/test_math/test_parameter_set.py
__eq__method inParameterSet.