Closed thrimbor closed 5 years ago
What are the plans for C11 adoption upstream? Would it make sense to send our code there (and then move it downstream)?
What are the plans for C11 adoption upstream? Would it make sense to send our code there (and then move it downstream)?
To my understanding upstream doesn't actively pursue C11 support atm, but is open to adding parts of it when requested.
I do actually plan to submit this upstream, too, but figured that merging it here would be the more quick way on the way to libc++ - rebasing to upstream if/when merged there could then happen together with a clean-up of the dlmalloc-changes.
The submitted functionality has been implemented upstream. I'm closing this in favor of an update-PR I plan to submit soon, so we can benefit from the additional improvements made upstream.
This implements
at_quick_exit()
andquick_exit()
. Both are C11 functions that are required by libc++.No "xbox"-prefix for this commit since it's a generic implementation.