Closed felix-kolbe closed 5 years ago
Wow, I think this concept is excellent. I have been looking at the Teensy 4.0 and I'm super confused about the pin alignments. This style would help for sure.
This definitely won't pass KLC if the symbols are going to be mainlined, but the concept of grouping pins is still nice.
As doctopus said. This is not compatible with KLC.
I modified the Teensy 3.6 symbol for various pin naming fixes and also various guidance to help actually using the Teensy on a breadboard. As a picture is better than thousand words, here a screenshot from the symbol editor: Inevitably, this changed the symbol dimensions, but I think it's good anyway. What do you think, okay to merge? Alternatively, we can create differently named symbol, which I unfortunately didn't consider initially. But, why having two symbols for same purpose.. Cheers, FK PS: Unfortunately the EOL-changes cannot be ignored on github's web diff.