XenGi / teensy_library

KiCAD library for Teensy microcontrollers
MIT License
283 stars 66 forks source link

Teensy 4.0 is now available. Symbol and Footprint needed. #18

Closed JayShoe closed 4 years ago

JayShoe commented 5 years ago

Teensy 4.0 is now available. There are many changes from previous layouts. I started peeking at the symbol and footprint but I haven't made anything yet. Anyone else working on them?

https://www.pjrc.com/teensy-4-0/

blackketter commented 5 years ago

Anybody working on this? I'm happy start on the T4 files, but don't want to step on anybody's toes.

blackketter commented 5 years ago

See pull request https://github.com/XenGi/teensy_library/pull/19

XenGi commented 5 years ago

Symbol is added. Footprint comes when I got some sleep.

blackketter commented 5 years ago

Thanks! When you are rested, I'd love for another set of eyes on this and any feedback you may have.

JayShoe commented 5 years ago

Hello friends,

The footprint seems to have some options as being discussed on the forum. The pads underneath are accessed via a few different ways.

I'm assuming the initial design should use pogo pins. But I'm interested in learning a little about the ribbon and flex PCB options, and to learn how it might affect the footprint.

blackketter commented 5 years ago

Yes, I’m working on a footprint right now with castellated edges that should connect all the pins.

Do you think we should have two symbols, one for just the through-hole connections that can be done with headers and another that includes all the pins?

blackketter commented 5 years ago

Here's where the footprint stands now:

Screen Shot 2019-08-13 at 9 11 42 AM

JayShoe commented 5 years ago

Hello blackketter

Do you think we should have two symbols, one for just the through-hole connections that can be done with headers and another that includes all the pins?

Sure why not? We might even want a few different options including the flex/ribbon cable option... And the Pogo options.

Here's where the footprint stands now:

Ahh! I see what you are saying about having the castellated edges... This is a good idea for after prototyping but for prototyping I think we will want removable parts. We could have a few footprints.

Sorry, not trying to say you need to do all of this, but just trying to help think through what might make sense.

blackketter commented 5 years ago

Great.

So, I think the through-hole version I already committed should be updated to include the holes for pins D24-D33 for the SMT header you referenced above.

I think maybe there should be a separate version that also adds the pogo pins for the non-through-hole connections. (USB D+- and uSD connector). Most folks won't need those holes and they might make routing harder for those cases.

I'll commit my castellated version and continue to refine it.

I'm working on one or two breakout boards that use that footprint. One that will bring out all the pins to 0.1" headers to make a removable CPU module.

Screen Shot 2019-08-13 at 11 15 04 AM

And another with castellated edges so that it can be mounted directly to a PCB. This has the benefit of being able to mount the Teensy board level with main PCB and having the castellated breakout board act as a connector.

Screen Shot 2019-08-13 at 11 11 36 AM

XenGi commented 5 years ago

This looks pretty cool. For me my initial footprint is completly enough but feel free to put some merge requests in.