Closed Xiangyu-Hu closed 1 year ago
Prof. Hu,
The simplified constructor is well orginazed and more efficient. I should learn form you.
I found a bug (caused by me) when calculating contact_max_
. I have corrected it and add regression test for case of 3d_elasticSolid_shell_collision. After corrected bug, the heuristic_limiter
can be set as 1.0, i.e, this limiter is not needed anymore. But I still keet it and set it as 0.4 as it do improve the stability.
Dong
@BenceVirtonomy @FabienPean-Virtonomy Hi, Bence and Fabien, I found a bug when calculating contactmax. After that, the heuristic_limiter can be set as 1.0, i.e, this limiter is not needed anymore. But I still keet it and set it as 0.4 as it do improve the stability. Sorry for misleading. Dong
@BenceVirtonomy @FabienPean-Virtonomy Hi, Bence and Fabien, I found a bug when calculating contactmax. After that, the heuristic_limiter can be set as 1.0, i.e, this limiter is not needed anymore. But I still keet it and set it as 0.4 as it do improve the stability. Sorry for misleading. Dong
Does that mean that it should be calibrated on a test case basis? Meaning different scenarios might require a different constant?
@BenceVirtonomy @FabienPean-Virtonomy Hi, Bence and Fabien, I found a bug when calculating contactmax. After that, the heuristic_limiter can be set as 1.0, i.e, this limiter is not needed anymore. But I still keet it and set it as 0.4 as it do improve the stability. Sorry for misleading. Dong
Does that mean that it should be calibrated on a test case basis? Meaning different scenarios might require a different constant?
No, it should remain constant for all cases.
I will try to generate regression test data in Linux system.
I will try to generate regression test data in Linux system.
Have you run the test on linux system?
I will try to generate regression test data in Linux system.
Have you run the test on linux system?
Yes, I have.
I will try to generate regression test data in Linux system.
Have you run the test on linux system?
Yes, I have.
Why did you cancel the CI in linux, as it looks ok?
I will try to generate regression test data in Linux system.
Have you run the test on linux system?
Yes, I have.
Why did you cancel the CI in linux, as it looks ok?
I think the Linux CI is cancelled by Github automatically, as it has run for more than 360 min.
I will try to generate regression test data in Linux system.
Have you run the test on linux system?
Yes, I have.
Why did you cancel the CI in linux, as it looks ok?
I think the Linux CI is cancelled by Github automatically, as it has run for more than 360 min.
I will try to generate regression test data in Linux system.
Have you run the test on linux system?
Yes, I have.
Why did you cancel the CI in linux, as it looks ok?
I think the Linux CI is cancelled by Github automatically, as it has run for more than 360 min.
Which suggests that the two-phase dambreak case runs into a dead loop?
It looks like a dead loop.
It looks like a dead loop. It passed now. So you can approve the pull request.
Hi, Dong, please check my revision on the constructor and compared the the differences. Xiangyu