This was already implemented, it was just not called from the step_synthesize_bitfile. According to the last synthesis I ran using Vitis/Vivado 2022.2, the DSP48 utilization seems to be reported in row 10 of the XML table, however the hard-coded index was set to 9 before - I have fixed this as well.
This was already implemented, it was just not called from the
step_synthesize_bitfile
. According to the last synthesis I ran using Vitis/Vivado 2022.2, the DSP48 utilization seems to be reported in row 10 of the XML table, however the hard-coded index was set to 9 before - I have fixed this as well.