Closed bpickrel closed 2 years ago
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
What is the source for the crowd.jpg image?
https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2009/2306189268_88cc86b30f_z.jpg and the MIGraphX repo
Why have you changed all of them to MIT now? If there's a new file you're adding that you've largely copied from somewhere else and it comes with an existing license header, then you should keep that header but for your own work, continue with Apache 2. Your existing examples shouldn't be relicensed
What is the source for the crowd.jpg image?
https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2009/2306189268_88cc86b30f_z.jpg and the MIGraphX repo
Thanks. The image is from https://www.flickr.com/photos/mattmangum/2306189268/ under a CC BY 2.0 license. Is there a reason you're adding this file for the yolo example rather than using the existing bicycle picture? That image gives you nicer boxes with higher confidences anyway
I got the link to the picture from the AMDMIGraphX repository. I'm using it because it's the same image as the script I modeled mine on, and I can compare results. If I add the image to the "proteus get" downloads to avoid the attribution problems of putting it in the repo, does it matter what directory it goes in?
This is per instructions from MVermeulen and guidance from company legal. The scripts they're based on come from our team, and we've had an initiative in recent months to correct the license statements on all our files. The MIT licenses are the ones from the source scripts.
Is this okay to merge or are you still adding more commits?
I'm finally done.
Closed by mistake; clicked the wrong button. Reopened!
Summary of Changes