Xilinx / xup_vitis_network_example

VNx: Vitis Network Examples
Other
137 stars 43 forks source link

Payload size limitation [XRT] #87

Closed KoalaYuFeng closed 2 years ago

KoalaYuFeng commented 2 years ago

I am using the host_xrt branch for UDP data transmission. I notice that in alveo_vnx_krnl_mm2s.cpp file, when size in AlveoVnxKrnlMM2S::transferDataToKrnl excceed 65532, it will exit, return 1. So the largest payload size in XRT version is 65532?

What causes this limitation? In my perspective, xrt::bo() function can allocate a larger memory size than 65532.

Can @mariodruiz please have a look? Thanks for your time.

mariodruiz commented 2 years ago

Hi @KoalaYuFeng,

I have not worked in that driver.

@fpgafais any idea?

mariodruiz commented 2 years ago

@KoalaYuFeng, did you try without the exit condition? If so, what was the outcome?

fpgafais commented 2 years ago

@KoalaYuFeng with UDP packets we typically aim to not exceed the maximum packet size which is 65536 per single transfer. Your payload data could have been fragmented into Ethernet frames by lower layers and transmitted out, but please check if you can reconstruct the complete payload on the receiving side

mariodruiz commented 2 years ago

The mm2s kernel is chunking the data to 1,408 Bytes if the user data is larger than that.

https://github.com/Xilinx/xup_vitis_network_example/blob/c16cba6598099f87e203659d7f8d6a536d97ef86/Basic_kernels/src/krnl_mm2s.cpp#L78

So, there should be no limitation on the host code. Unless the mm2s kernel has changed.

fpgafais commented 2 years ago

@mariodruiz right, but 1.4k frames originating from the same transfer should be tagged with UDP offset to be reconstructed into a single packet by the receiving side. The size field in UDP headers is 4 hex so one can build offsets up to 65535. Further fragmentation of larger payloads should be handled on another, upper layer

mariodruiz commented 2 years ago

That's right. Thank you!

KoalaYuFeng commented 2 years ago

@KoalaYuFeng, did you try without the exit condition? If so, what was the outcome?

I just try without exit and meanwhile reconstruct the receive code, it works in a right condition. now it can support larger payload size. Thanks for your time and help.

KoalaYuFeng commented 2 years ago

Thanks for your time and help.