Closed 0xbeny closed 10 months ago
I'd propose a slight modification to #2, have the proposer stake their XDC while the proposal is live. This would open a door for the judiciary committee to punish proposers who were bad actors by burning their stake. This would be one mechanism to keep the bar to creating a proposal low while still being able to deter bad actors.
Super! thanks for your collaboration.
I think that would be a strong mechanism to prevent spam proposal. in the above scenario, Is the stake amount will refund to proposer after sometime or it's like cost of creating proposal?
A suggestion: During the proposal creation, we charge extra XDC tokens(native token) and send it to DAO treasury as proposal fee and it's not refundable. example: Daofin charges a fixed amount like 1,000 XDC
per proposal regardless of who is sending it.
The agreed scenario is charging the proposer X amount of XDC token which is not refundable.
Intro:
Apart from managing Committees, To get ball rolling on DAOFIN, we need to open the floor to proposers and community members to create a proposal. There is one thing to note here is that based on the current draft, anyone can create a proposal. so there might be a risk of spam proposals to over come this problem there are a couple of fixes:
createProposal
function from smart contract